Re: [sig-policy] prop-072: Reapplication limits whentransferringaddress
>> activated in the future
>> to me, the rpki cert is the core of transfer. you either issue it or
>> not.
> I issued as registry role. I'm not clear that the implication of taken
> option-2 is necessary of rpki cert. Would you correct me?
apologies. i am known for being overly terse.
i am thinking longish term, when the rpki strongly influences, actually
controls, routing. if you have a validatable chain up from the roa to
the iana root, then your packets move. if you do not have that chain,
they don't.
any 'swing point' in the transfer [0], e.g. an rir, either certifies the
transfer, in the rpki sense, or not. so, your 'flag' has no actual
semantic effect. either the cert has been issued or not.
am i being any clearer?
randy
--
[0] - http://archive.psg.com/071208.transfer.pdf