[sig-policy] justification of recipient of the transfer policy

To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: [sig-policy] justification of recipient of the transfer policy
From: Ren-Hung Hwang <rhhwang at gmail dot com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:41:02 +0800
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear SIG members,

I just wonder if anyone remember that we had a consensus on
"address requirement justification is required for the receipient of address transfer

until the free pool runs out and then not after". I did not see it in the final version of

prop-050.

Ren-Hung

--
Ren-Hung Hwang
Professor and Chair
Dept. of Computer Science & Information Engineering
National Chung Cheng Univ.
Chia-Yi, Taiwan, 621
http://exodus.cs.ccu.edu.tw/~rhhwang