Re: [sig-policy] Last Call for Comments on prop-050: IPv4 address transf
> organization from transferring address space, turning around and
> requesting more space from APNIC, transferring that space, etc. etc.?
> This seems like a loophole big enough to use to corner the IPv4
> address market, and drain both the APNIC and IANA free pools in a very
> short time.
>
> Prior versions of this proposal had some safeguards to prevent that
> kind of thing, but it looks like all of those were removed in this
> version.
this was the consensus of the meeting in manila. consensus was not
achieved with such 'safaguards.'
i suspect, once this is done, we are likely to see a few test proposals
addressing what some see as remaining issues.
randy