Re: [sig-policy] Open Request Regarding Address Transfer Policy Proposal

To: sig-policy at apnic dot net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Open Request Regarding Address Transfer Policy Proposals
From: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:12:09 +1300
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <1F5286B8-C29A-4FDB-889D-9E7974B37CDB@apnic.net>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200902190555.n1J5tEPv099253@lon-assurance.telstra.net> <1F5286B8-C29A-4FDB-889D-9E7974B37CDB@apnic.net>

I also support David Woodgate's excellent proposal as a useful way to

combine current efforts to get the policy development on Address

Transfer moving. If we can come up agreements on these points then

policies can be crafted which the community can reach a useful

consensus on.


Regards
andy