Re: [sig-policy] Open Request Regarding Address Transfer Policy Proposal
< chair hat = on >
> I therefore believe that it is in the interests of the APNIC community
> to debate the individual sub-proposals that have been raised (rather
> than simply voting on the existing proposals as written)
i am in complete agreement, though have not heard from jian on this.
> the SIG workshop at next week's meeting should be structured to seek
> the consensus on each of these individual points.
that is what i have been suggesting and is the agenda awaiting agreement
among the chairs.
> I believe that the relevant sub-proposals are that:
>
> 1. Address transfers should be permitted between APNIC members
>
> 2. Address transfers should be permitted between APNIC members and NIR members
> - (If meeting relevant NIR policies)
>
> 3. Address transfers should be permitted between APNIC members and
> members of other RIRs
> -(If meeting relevant other RIR policies)
>
> 4. The minimum permissible size of a sub-transfer of an APNIC address
> block should be EITHER a /24 OR minimum APNIC policy size
> - (To be decided)
>
> 5. Address transfers should be justified to and scrutinised by APNIC
>
> 6. Address transfers should EITHER be enabled immediately, OR only
> enabled after particular criteria have been met
> - For example, once APNIC has reached its last /8
> - (To be decided)
>
> 7. APNIC should maintain a public log of the allocation history of an address
>
> 8. APNIC members transferring address blocks to others should not be
> eligible to receive additional address blocks for at least two years.
looks good to me, though i might not nail down as much detail. i.e. 8
could be done with a time other than two years (as well as not done,
obviously). but those are nits.
does anybody object to this approach?
randy