Re: [sig-policy] Inter-registry transfers
On 17/02/2009, at 2:51 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
Hi Randy and all,
I did notice a few people claiming we should go one step at a time,
first start with APNIC region then extend to other RIRs.
There is a routing operators who expressed concerns about the impact
on
routing to allow cross-RIR transfers at this stage, like as the
question
about the size i mentioned earlier, impact on region-based
filtering, etc.
Anyways, most people supported the concept of inter-RIR, either we
do it
in one go/take two steps.
Either way, the issue about reverse DNS is also germane. As it is with
prop-69 what are the onging management and implications of the various
transfer scenarios? Knowing that DNS delegation are strictly
hierarchical.
just off the top of my head:
o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an APNIC member
o a /22 from an IIJ /16 transferred to an ARIN member
o a /24 from an ARIN member transfered to a KRNIC member
.. and so on.
what should the membership expect, what are the buyer's and seller's
responsibilities?
and dare I ask - is it at all important?
Cheers
Terry