Re: [sig-policy] prop-069-v002: Global policy proposal for theallocation
I general, I am in agreement with Version 2. There is one
proviso that could and should be strengthened, that is
in the Introduction section: "This document does not stipulate
performance requirements in the provision of services by the
IANA to an RIR in accordance with this proposed policy.
Such requirements should be specified by appropriate
agreements among the RIRs and ICANN." needs work.
Something along the lines that ALL RIR's should have a
universal policy and practice in agreements between the
RIR's and ICANN and those policies and practices should
be with full input from all stakeholders.
Randy Bush wrote:
> Dear SIG members
>
> Version 2 of the proposal "Global policy proposal for the
> allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries" has been
> sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the
> Policy SIG at APNIC 27 in Manila, Philippines, 23-27 February 2009.
>
> The proposal's history can be found at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-069-v002.html
>
> This new version of the proposal contains a new section, "Definitions"
> inserted after section 1, "Introduction".
>
> We encourage you to express your views on the proposal:
>
> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
> randy and jian
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> prop-069-v002: Global policy proposal for the allocation of IPv4 blocks
> to Regional Internet Registries
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Authors: Adiel A. Akplogan, AfriNIC
> Raul Echeberria, LACNIC
> Maemura Akinori, APNIC
> Geoff Huston, APNIC
> Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC
> Ray Plzak, ARIN
> Oscar A. Robles-Garay, LACNIC
> Nigel Titley, RIPE NCC
> Paul Wilson, APNIC
>
> Note: This proposal was developed by a team consisting of
> persons from each of the 5 RIRs
>
> Version: 2
>
> Date: 3 February 2009
>
> 1. Introduction
> ----------------
>
> This document is a global policy proposal governing the allocation of
> IPv4 address space from the IANA to the Regional Internet Registries
> (RIRs).
>
> This document does not stipulate performance requirements in the
> provision of services by the IANA to an RIR in accordance with this
> proposed policy. Such requirements should be specified by appropriate
> agreements among the RIRs and ICANN.
>
> 2. Definitions
> --------------
>
> 2.1 Recovered address space
>
> Recovered address space is that address space that is returned to an
> RIR as a result of any activity that seeks to reclaim unused address
> space or is voluntarily returned to the RIR or is reclaimed by the
> RIR as a result of legal action or abuse determination. Recovered
> address space does not include that address space that is reclaimed
> because of non-payment of contractual fees whose reclamation date is
> less than 1 year at the time of the report.
>
> 2.2 IPv4 address holdings
>
> IPv4 address holdings are all unallocated IPv4 address space held by
> an RIR to include recovered address space not yet returned less that
> address space that is committed in accordance with the RIR's
> reservation policy and practices.
>
> 3. Summary of current problem
> ------------------------------
>
> With the depletion of the IANA free pool of IPv4 address space, the
> current policy regarding the allocation of IPv4 address space to the
> RIRs will become moot. The RIRs may, according to their individual
> policies and procedures, recover IPv4 address space. This policy
> provides a mechanism for the RIRs to retro allocate the recovered IPv4
> address space to the IANA and provides the IANA the policy by which it
> can allocate it back to the RIRs on a needs basis. This policy creates a
> new global pool of IPv4 address space that can be allocated where it is
> needed on a global basis without a transfer of address space between the
> RIRs.
>
> 4. Situation in other RIRs
> ----------------------------
>
> This proposal is being submitted in all RIR regions, with a view to
> becoming a global policy [1].
>
> 5. Details of the proposal
> ----------------------------
>
> This policy is to be implemented in two phases:
>
> - Phase I: Recovery of IPv4 address space
> - Phase II: Allocation of recovered IPv4 address space by the IANA
>
> 5.1 Phase I: Recovery of IPv4 address space
>
> Upon ratification of this policy by the ICANN Board of Directors the
> IANA shall establish a mechanism to receive IPv4 address space which
> is returned to it by the RIRs, and hold that address space in a
> 'recovered IPv4 pool'.
>
> Each RIR through their respective chosen policies and strategies may
> recover IPv4 address space which is under their administration. Each
> RIR shall at quarterly intervals return any such recovered address
> space to the IANA in aggregated blocks of /24 or larger, for
> inclusion in the recovered IPv4 pool.
>
> During Phase I, no allocations will be made from the recovered IPv4
> pool.
>
> 5.2 Phase II: Allocation of recovered IPv4 address space by the IANA
>
> Upon ratification of this policy by the ICANN Board of Directors and
> a declaration by the IANA that its existing free pool of unallocated
> IPv4 address space is depleted; Global Addressing Policy ASO-001-2
> (adopted by ICANN Board 8 April 2005) [2] is rescinded. IANA will
> then commence to allocate the IPv4 address space from the recovered
> IPv4 pool.
>
> 5.2.1 Allocation of IPv4 address space
>
> a. For the purposes of this policy, an 'IPv4 allocation
> period' is defined as a 6-month period following 1 March or
> 1 September in each year.
>
> b. At the beginning of each IPv4 allocation period, the IANA
> will determine the 'IPv4 allocation unit' for that period,
> as 1/10 of its IPv4 address pool, rounded down to the next
> CIDR (power-of-2) boundary.
>
> c. In each allocation period, each RIR may issue one IPv4
> request to the IANA. Providing that the RIR satisfies the
> allocation criteria described section 4.2.2, the IANA will
> allocate a single allocation unit, composed of the smallest
> possible number of blocks available in its IPv4 address
> pool.
>
> 5.2.2 IPv4 address space allocation criteria
>
> A RIR is eligible to receive additional IPv4 address space
> from the IANA when the total of its IPv4 address holdings is
> less than 50% of the current IPv4 allocation unit, and
> providing that it has not already received an IPv4 allocation
> from the IANA during the current IPv4 allocation period.
>
> 5.2.3 Initial allocation of IPv4 address space
>
> Each new RIR shall, at the moment of recognition, be
> allocated one (1) allocation unit by the IANA. If an
> allocation unit is not available, then the IANA will issue
> this block as soon as one is available. This allocation will
> be made regardless of the newly formed RIR's projected
> utilization figures and shall be independent of the IPv4
> address space that may have been transferred to the new RIR
> by the already existing RIRs as part of the formal transition
> process.
>
> 5.3 Reporting
>
> a. All returned space is to be recorded in an IANA-published log of
> IPv4 address space transactions, with each log entry detailing
> the returned address block, the date of the return, and the
> returning RIR.
>
> b. All allocated space is also to be recorded in this IANA-published
> log of IPv4 address space transactions, with each log entry
> detailing the address blocks, the date of the allocation and the
> recipient RIR.
>
> c. The IANA will maintain a public registry of the current
> disposition of all IPv4 address space, detailing all reservations
> and current allocations and current IANA-held address space that
> is unallocated.
>
> d. The IANA may make public announcements of IPv4 address block
> transactions that occur under this policy. The IANA will make
> appropriate modifications to the "Internet Protocol V4 Address
> Space" page of the IANA website [3] and may make announcements to
> its own appropriate announcement lists. The IANA announcements
> will be limited to which address ranges, the time of allocation
> and to which Registry they have been allocated.
>
> 5.4 Timetable for implementation
>
> This policy is to be implemented immediately upon ratification by
> the ICANN Board of Directors according to the global policy process
> described in the ASO MoU [4].
>
> 6. Advantages and disadvantages of the proposal
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> 6.1 Advantages
>
> - The policy provides a mechanism for the ongoing distribution of
> IPv4 address space.
>
> 6.2 Disadvantages
>
> - None identified.
>
> 7. Effect on APNIC members
> ----------------------------
>
> This policy governs the allocation relationship between the IANA and
> the RIRs. It does not imply any change to allocation relationships
> between APNIC and its members.
>
> 8. Effect on NIRs
> -------------------
>
> This policy governs the allocation relationship between the IANA and
> the RIRs. It does not imply any change to allocation relationships
> between APNIC and NIRs.
>
> 9. References
> -------------
>
> [1] Section 5, ICANN Address Supporting Organization (ASO) MoU
> http://aso.icann.org/docs/aso-mou2004.html
>
> [2] Global Addressing Policy ASO-001-2
> http://aso.icann.org/docs/aso-001-2.pdf
>
> [3] Internet Protocol v4 Address Space
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
>
> [4] Attachment A: Global Policy Development Process, ASO MoU
> http://aso.icann.org/docs/aso-mou2004.html
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
My Phone: 214-244-4827