Re: [sig-policy] co-chair

To: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] co-chair
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:19:14 +0900
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4977C727.3080702 at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4977C727.3080702@psg.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081204 Thunderbird/3.0b1

On 09.01.22 10:08, Randy Bush wrote:

jian and sam,

my impression is that it would be good if we picked up the ball we
dropped in christchurch and solicited for a co-chair.  does that seem
reasonable to you.

randy

my apologies to the list, and especially jian and sam. this was

intended to go to the internal sig-policy-chairs list. <blush>


think of it as the new american openness :)

again, apologies.

randy