[sig-policy] prop-067: A simple transfer proposal

  • To: "'APNIC Policy SIG List'" <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
  • Subject: [sig-policy] prop-067: A simple transfer proposal
  • From: "zhangjian" <zhangjian at cnnic dot cn>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:36:01 +0800
  • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
  • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
  • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
  • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
  • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Thread-index: AclmOYabKEteZTcMRUKTp+R9DuI/lw==
    • Dear SIG members

       

      'A simple transfer proposal' has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 27 in Manila, Philippines, 23-27 February 2009.

       

      The proposal's history can be found at:

       

            http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-067-v001.html

       

      We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the meeting.

       

      The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to express your views on the proposal:

       

            - Do you support or oppose this proposal?

       

            - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,

              tell the community about your situation.

       

            - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?

       

            - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?

       

            - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more

              effective?

       

      Jian and Randy

       

      ________________________________________________________________________

       

      prop-067-v001: A simple transfer proposal ________________________________________________________________________

       

       

      Authors:   Randy Bush

                  randy at psg dot com

       

                  Philip Smith

                  pfs at cisco dot com

       

      Version:   1

       

      Date:      24 December 2008

       

       

       

      1.  Introduction

      ----------------

       

      This policy proposal seeks to permit APNIC to document transfers of IPv4 address space between organisations.

       

       

      2.  Summary of current problem

      ------------------------------

       

      There is already a small and growing activity of organisations holding Internet resources transferring these resources between each other.

       

      There is no record of these transfers held by APNIC, resulting in the invalidity of registration information for those resources.

       

       

      3.  Situation in other RIRs

      ---------------------------

       

      RIPE NCC:

       

           The policy proposal 2007-08, "Enabling Methods for Reallocation of

           IPv4 Resources" was accepted in December 2008. See:

       

               http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html

       

       

      ARIN:

       

          The proposal 2007-08, "Transfer Policy Clarifications" was

          implemented in August 2007:

       

               http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_8.html

       

           Proposal 2008-02, "IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal" was abandoned:

       

               http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2008_2.html

       

           The proposal 2008-06, "Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses"

           is in last call until 21 January 2009:

       

               http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2008_6.html

       

       

      LACNIC and AfriNIC have no similar policy.

       

       

      4.  Details of the proposal

      ---------------------------

       

      It is proposed that:

       

      4.1 An organisation may transfer:

       

           a. An intact allocated block

       

               - Allocated blocks smaller than the current minimum APNIC

                 allocation size may also be transferred as an intact block.

                 For example, a legacy /24.

       

            b. One or more subnets of an allocated block, provided no subnet is

               smaller than the current minimum APNIC allocation size.

       

       

      4.2 The recipient must be able to justify use of the transferred

           resources according to current APNIC allocation and assignment

           criteria.

       

       

      4.3 Transfers between regions are permitted providing that:

       

           a. The organisation originating transfer of an address block must

              follow the policies of the originating RIR.

       

           b. The organisation receiving an address block must follow the

              policies of the receiving RIR.

       

       

      4.4 The originating address holder must be the holder of record,

           whether a current member, historical, or otherwise.

       

       

      4.5 If either the origin or recipient of the address block is in the

           APNIC region, they should be the holder of a current account in

           APNIC or the appropriate NIR.

       

       

      4.6 If the originating address holder is in the APNIC region, they are

           prohibited from receiving more IPv4 address space, whether via

           transfer or directly from APNIC, for two years.

       

       

      5.  Advantages and disadvantages of the proposal

      ------------------------------------------------

       

      5.1 Advantages

       

           - The policy ensures the continued accuracy of APNIC's assignment

             and allocation database.

       

             Most service providers on the Internet today check the RIR

             assignment and allocation databases to determine who the

             legitimate holder of the Internet resources is prior to accepting

             those resources in routing announcements from their customers.

             This proposal ensures that they can carry on with this valuable

             validation technique during the run-out phase of IPv4 when

             transfers become more commonplace.

       

       

           - The policy allows currently allocated yet unused IPv4 address

             space to be transferred to an entity that will be able to make use

             of it.

       

       

      5.2 Disadvantages

       

           - None.

       

       

      6.  Effect on APNIC Members

      ---------------------------

       

      The proposal impacts all APNIC members in that it allows them to originate or receive transfers of IPv4 address space directly to/from another LIR.

       

       

      7.  Effect on NIRs

      ------------------

       

      The proposal has no direct impact on NIRs, but impacts members of NIRs in the same way it impacts APNIC members.

       

      _______________________________________________

      Sig-policy-chair mailing list

      Sig-policy-chair at apnic dot net

      http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy-chair