Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-062-v001: Use of final /8
- To: "zhangjian" <zhangjian at cnnic dot cn>, "'APNIC Policy SIG List'" <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] prop-062-v001: Use of final /8
- From: David Woodgate <David.Woodgate at telstra dot net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:31:11 +1000
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <416114513.26457 at cnnic dot cn>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
My initial reaction to this proposal is that it may make a large amount of the addresses in the last /8 unavailable for use by the Internet community.
My reasoning for this is thus:- The proposal suggests that all new and existing LIRs would get only one /22 from the last /8
- There were ~1600 APNIC members at the start of 2008 - I don't know the number of ISPs behind the NIRs, but I'm guessing ~1000 ?- APNIC membership grew ~200 in 2007, so allow for growth of ~1000 ISPs over 5 years Therefore, there may be only ~4000 LIRs in the Asia-Pacific over the next 5 years.
The proposal allows for 16,384 LIRs to receive allocations from the last /8, but if there are only 4,000 LIRs, then 75% of the /8 would remain unused (or about 12 million addresses).
If this is the right order of magnitude, would it be more appropriate to identify this proposal against a smaller size block than the entire /8? For comparison, the LACNIC policy that has been introduced only applies to the last /12, not the last /8.
(I would be very happy for someone to provide more accurate forecasts than I have roughly calculated above of the numbers of LIRs expected in the Asia-Pacific region over coming years.)
Regards, David Woodgate