Re: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocationsize to
This suggestion seems like a devide and mess up stratagy.
David Woodgate wrote:
> And, to clarify my previous statement, I was assuming that any
> discussion about fees and membership structure would need to happen
> outside of the Policy SIG.
>
> My main concern is that the current proposal seems to be intertwining
> these other aspects with the question of what should be the smallest
> allocation, and I would prefer to see these items separated and
> debated in their respective areas.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Woodgate
>
> At 01:03 PM 26/02/2008, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > In particular, if the proposal has now changed towards a minimum
> > > allocation of a /22 - only half that of the current /21 - then it is
> > > not clear to me that a new membership tier is required. If the
> > > current fee structure is considered prohibitive, then I would suggest
> > > that the fees should be reviewed first before seeking alterations to
> > > the membership structure.
> >
> ><personal opinion not discussed with other co-chairs>
> >
> >i am hesitant to have the policy sig get into the fee structure, as the
> >bylaws are clear that this is an EC function/responsibility. i would
> >hope we can find a path to discuss allocation and other policies without
> >getting into either the fee structure or rir operational details.
> >
> >randy
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
My Phone: 214-244-4827