Re: [sig-policy] Report on prop-056: IPv4 soft landing
After some consideration (and prodding :-)), I've decided to present a
modified version of this proposal at the APNIC meeting. For the time being,
you can ignore this proposal.
Regards,
-drc
On 2/21/08 7:06 PM, "Toshiyuki Hosaka" <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp> wrote:
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> prop-056: IPv4 soft landing
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Dear SIG members
>
> Below is a summary of discussion on the proposal since the last
> summary was posted on 5 February 2008. We encourage you to continue
> discussion on the mailing list before it is presented at the Policy
> SIG session at APNIC 25 on Thursday 28 February 2008.
>
> We particularly encourage those of you who have previously not taken
> part in the discussion to express your views:
>
> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>
> - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
> tell the community about your situation.
>
> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>
> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>
> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
>
> Discussion statistics
> ---------------------
>
> Number of posts
>
> - Since last summary: 3
> - Since proposal posted (24 January 2008): 5
>
> People participating in discussions
>
> - Since last summary: 3
> - Since proposal posted (24 January 2008): 4
>
> Economy of origin of participants: 1 from Australia
> 1 from Japan
> 2 from outside AP
>
> Summary of discussion since last summary
> ----------------------------------------
>
> - In the light of Geoff Huston's projected figures on the impact
> of tightening the utilisation criteria, should this proposal
> be withdrawn?
>
> - Saving addresses is not the sole aim of this proposal
>
> - The proposal sends a clear message to the community about
> the need to make the transition to IPv6
>
> - The projected figures may not be reflected in reality
>
>
> Full details of the proposal, including a link to the previous
> discussion summary posted to this list, can be found at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-056-v001.html
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>