Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v002: New version

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v002: New version
From: David Hughes <david.hughes at webcentral dot com dot au>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:10:32 +1000
Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <47B42EFD.6030808 at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47B42EFD.6030808@psg.com>


On 14/02/2008, at 10:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to:

      - Ask the proposer questions if anything in the proposal is
        unclear
      - Point out advantages and disadvantages you see in the proposal
      - State whether you support or oppose the proposal



I support this proposal.

Any policy that is an impediment to an organisations adoption of IPv6

must be viewed as counter productive at this point in time.

Simplifying the process via which an entity can receive it's initial

v6 allocation removes one more obstacle.



Thanks

David
...