Hi,
As the author:
On 2/11/08 5:35 PM, "Toshiyuki Hosaka" <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp> wrote:
> - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
Unless there is a strong argument otherwise, I'm planning on suggesting this
proposal be dropped.
The issue is that according to Geoff's address consumption projections, the
savings generated by Soft Landing will amount to a few months at best.
While I might have some argument with a particular assumption Geoff makes,
this is somewhat irrelevant.
The intent of Soft Landing was to make sure
efforts were undertaken to increase address utilization efficiency and
migrate (or at least integrate) IPv6.
My personal suspicion is that Geoff's proposal will have a much more
significant effect in the AP region in this regard (:-)).
So, unless someone feels strongly otherwise (and expresses this to me or on
this list in the next couple of days), consider 056 withdrawn...
Regards,
-drc
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on
resource management policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1273
- Release Date: 12/02/2008 09:31 a.m.