[sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /24

  • To: sig-policy at apnic dot net
  • Subject: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /24
  • From: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp>
  • Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:07:24 +0900
  • Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
  • List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
  • List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
  • List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
  • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Organization: Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)
  • User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
    • 
      The proposal "Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /24" has been
      sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at
      APNIC 25 in Taipei, Taiwan, 25-29 February 2008.
      
      The proposal's history can be found at:
      
               http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-053-v001.html
      
      We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
      before the meeting.
      
      The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
      important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to:
      
           - Ask the proposer questions if anything in the proposal is unclear
           - Point out advantages and disadvantages you see in the proposal
           - State whether you support or oppose the proposal
      
      Mailing list discussions will be taken into account when the proposal
      is discussed at the upcoming APNIC meeting. So please make sure you have
      your say.
      
      
      ________________________________________________________________________
      
      prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to /24
      ________________________________________________________________________
      
      
      
      Author:    Rajesh Chharia
                  <rc at cjnet4u dot com>
      
      Version:   1
      
      Date:      7 January 2008
      
      
      
      1.  Introduction
      ----------------
      This is a proposal to change the minimum IPv4 allocation size from /21
      to /24 and to create a new membership tier with an annual fee of
      AU$500 for members with a /24 allocation.
      
      
      2.  Summary of current problem
      ------------------------------
      If a small ISP receives the current minimum IPv4 allocation size of
      /21, the ISP falls into the Small APNIC membership tier and must pay
      an annual fee of AU$3,169 [1].
      
      In India, there are a lot of smaller ISPs who do not actually require
      a /21. These ISPs would be satisfied with even a /24 if it meant that
      the associated fees for the allocation were reduced. However, the
      option of an allocation of less than a /21 is not currently available,
      meaning that small ISPs must pay a minimum of AU$3,169 per year for an
      allocation.
      
      
      3.   Situation in other RIRs
      ----------------------------
      The minimum IPv4 allocation sizes in other RIR regions are:
      
      - AfriNIC:  /22
      - ARIN:     /22 for multihoming, otherwise /20
      - LACNIC:   /20
      - RIPE:     /21
      
      
      
      4.   Details of the proposal
      ----------------------------
      It is proposed that:
      
           1. The minimum IPv4 allocation size be changed from /21 to /24.
      
           2. A new membership tier be introduced for /24 allocations.
      
              This new tier will have an annual fee of AU$500.
      
      
      5.   Advantages and disadvantages of the proposal
      -------------------------------------------------
      Advantages:
      
      - Small ISPs will be able to request an allocation smaller than a /21.
      
      - More small ISPs will be able to afford direct allocations from
         APNIC.
      
      - IP resources can be saved by reducing potential waste associated
         with giving a /21 to small ISPs that do not need that much space.
      
      
      Disadvantage:
      
      - No disadvantage to anybody.
      
      
      6.   Effect on APNIC members
      ----------------------------
      A lot of new smaller members will join APNIC.
      
      
      7.   Effect on NIRs
      -------------------
      No effect.
      
      
      References
      ----------
      [1]  APNIC member fee schedule: tiers, fees, and descriptions
            http://www.apnic.net/docs/corpdocs/member-fee-schedule.html
      
      ---
      APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
      Toshiyuki Hosaka
      Randy Bush
      Jian Zhang