Re: [sig-policy] Recommendation from RMS WG for prop-037
> yamasaki-san,
>
>> Please let me submit recommendation from the Resource Management System
>> Working Group as follows:
>>
>> ---
>> APNIC should deprecate email update for its registry and whois data with
>> phasing-out period.
>>
>>
>> However, the working group has received concern from a member. The
>> concern is that rationalisation for development for bulk registration
>> engine within an APNIC member is difficult if the organisation uses
>> automated e-mail based system for registering to APNIC resource
>> management system.
>> ---
>>
>> Since the activity of the RMS WG began after APNIC 23, only one message
>> was posted from APNIC members.
>
> some questions:
>
> does this represent consensus of the wg?
After the draft of my recommendation was posted, only one message was
posted from a WG member. It was difficult to make judgement what was
consensus. Therefore, I decided to submit the original recommendation
with the comment.
>
> the only feedback was one message and it was negative?
Yes.
>
> there was no feeling from the last face to face meeting?
Do you mean "Did you get feedback from attendees for this issue during
APNIC 24?" If so, the answer is no.
>
> randy
>
--
Shin Yamasaki
Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)