Hi Fujisaki-sanThank you for spotting the typo and inconsistency in the document. We will correct these errors before the next version is released.
Regards Son (Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/?? ??) wrote:
Hi Son, Thank you very much for drafting the IPv6 policy. I have two comments. In section 2.7: > 2.7. Utilization > > Unlike IPv4, IPv6 is generally assigned to end sites in fixed amounts > (/48). The actual usage of addresses within each assignment will be > quite low, when compared to IPv4 assignments. In IPv6, "utilization" > is only measured in terms of the bits to the left of the /56 > boundary. In other words, utilization refers to the assignment of > /56 sto end sites, and not the number of addresses assigned within ^^^^^^^ /56s to ? > 5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria> > Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organization (ISP/LIR)> satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilization in> terms of the number of sites in units of /48 assignments.Should this 'in units of /48 assignments' be modified so as to be consistent with the description in section 2.7 and 2.8 ? Yours sincerely, -- Tomohiro Fujisaki, NTT * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Son Tran email: son at apnic dot net Policy Development Manager, APNIC sip: son at voip dot apnic dot net http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100 fax: +61 7 3858 3199
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature