At 07:08 PM 25/09/2006, Izumi Okutani wrote:
Hi, I received some questions from our LIRs about this proposal and thought I'd share them on this list as well. + Should the initial allocation criteria be changed with this policy to 200 customers, instead of /48s? $B!!(B"have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other organizations within two years."
This could be a logically consistent change, in that it appears that the intent of the Ipv6 allocation policy is to allow IPv6 resource allocations to be available to service providers with customers.
+ What would be the minimum registration requirements per endsite? A suggestion JPNIC has is to allow all dynamic assignments and /64s to be aggregated as LIR's infrastructure, but require all other assignments per endsite, to be consistent with v4.
Would there be any particular motivation to deviate from a practice that is consistent with Ipv4? (I can't think of any at this stage.)
regards, Geoff