Re: [sig-policy] IPv6 discussion in the ARIN and RIPE communities- what
We introduced the idea to JP community and received two comments so far.
Both stated that it is okay to stick with the current policy as we can
always come up with an alternative if we use it up.
We also plan introduce the idea at our coming Open Policy Meeting in
July, so I will share them on this ML if there are futher discussions.
Izumi
JPNIC
Save Vocea wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> Recently at the ARIN XV and RIPE 50 meetings there were discussions made in
> their meetings that I wish to share with the APNIC community.
>
> This is to change the HD ratio in IPv6 from 0.8 to 0.94 which also lead to
> discussion about the /48 assignment size to end sites and whether it could
> be made smaller
>
> Both topics have been generating "a lot of" discussions in amongst both the
> ARIN and RIPE communities
>
> If interested please read through postings archived in the ARIN ppml list at
> http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/ppml/index.html
> Under thread topics
> - Proposed policy: IPv6 HD ratio
> - IPv6 >> 32
>
> In the RIPE community, mailing list discussions can be found in
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2005/index.ht
> ml
>
> I look forward and hope to see comments from this community and to
> facilitate discussions here.
>
> Sincerely,
> Save