Re: [sig-policy]Request to delay finalizing addressing proposals

To: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy]Request to delay finalizing addressing proposals
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 07:57:15 -0800
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten at us dot ibm dot com>, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200211290411.gAT4BKB09853@cichlid.adsl.duke.edu><5.1.0.14.2.20021202121900.06a48e70@localhost>
Sender: sig-policy-admin@lists.apnic.net

> this sort of level of global discussion amongst the registries
> and their membership at their public meetings seems quite
> worrying to me.

'unaware' may not be the best term.  understanding how to insert
engineering and operations views into a layer nine meeting has been
far from obvious.

randy