RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPRO
Thank you for the information.
Regards,
Chanki
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Lord [mailto:anne at apnic dot net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: Chanki Park
> Cc: 'Philip Smith'; sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net;
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> Subject: Re: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no
> consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001
>
> Chanki
>
> >
> > So my expectation was "A tie" or "can not decide" instead of
> > "no consensus".
> > (This is the reason I call the chair's decision A MISTAKE)
> >
>
> One important clarification. This is not a vote. Therefore a
> "tie" or
> "cannot decide" does not exist in the policy development process.
> Both are states that indicate that there is no general consensus.
>
> I hope this helps,
>
> Anne
> --
>