Re: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re:Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIP
>
> Then let's discuss what to do.
Okay, if you feel more comforatable to wait for the EC's decision first,
that's fine.
Regards,
Izumi
Chanki Park wrote:
>>Great, how do the NIRs feel about this?
>>
>
>
> Let's correct a mistake first.
>
> Then let's discuss what to do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chanki
>
>
>>Would you like to work closely on the proposal by setting up a working
>>group? If yes, we can call for the volunteers publicly from the whole
>>community.
>>
>>Izumi
>>
>>Philip Smith wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Izumi-san,
>>>
>>>Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
>>>
>>>
>>>>As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
>>>>proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over
>>
>>this particular
>>
>>>>proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the
>>
>>decision, and I
>>
>>>>felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
>>>>"no-consensus".
>>>>
>>>>This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
>>>>continue discussions on this topic.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original
>>
>>motivation of the
>>
>>>proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact
>>
>>on APNIC. A
>>
>>>solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
>>>precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
>>>described earlier.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
>>>
>>>
>>>That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd
>>
>>find that at
>>
>>>all useful.
>>>
>>>philip
>>>--
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>sig-nir mailing list
>>sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
>>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
>>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>