Re: 1 suggestion necessary to discuss in NIR SIG
Not sig-nir at apnic dot net but sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net is the
right address. resent.
In message <200408131220.BHG30524.FNNB@maem.org>
"Re: 1 suggestion necessary to discuss in NIR SIG"
"MAEMURA Akinori <maem at maem dot org>" wrote:
| YongWan,
|
| Sure please let us have your report there.
|
| JPNIC is also working on the privacy information issue
| because we've already had a legislation and we have to be
| compliant by April 2005. You will have some stuff around
| this in JPNIC update.
|
|
|
| Save,
|
| Please add "co-chair election" in the agenda.
|
|
| Everyone,
|
| Looking forward to seeing your willingness for co-chair ;-)
|
|
| Regards,
| Akinori, Chair for NIR-SIG
|
|
|
| In message <02ff01c480d4$0c53d820$bdb4fea9@LocalHost>
| "1 suggestion necessary to discuss in NIR SIG"
| ""ywju" <ywju at nic dot or dot kr>" wrote:
|
| | This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
| |
| | Dear all,
| |
| | This is Yong Wan Ju from KRNIC of National Internet Development Agency.
| | If not late, I would like to insert 1 agendum to discuss in NIR.
| | The subject is Whois service status after announcement of APNIC's
| | propoal about Whois service
| | considering protection of privacy.
| |
| | If it is possible, let's share the NIR status about whois service
| | with short memo during short time.
| |
| | Is anyone have any other ideas ?
| |
| | Sincerely yours,
| |
| | Yong Wan Ju
| |