Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] The charter of IANAxfer@APNIC

[Masato Yamanishi <myamanis@japan-telecom.com>]

Aftab,

I’m also delaying, so it’s OK.

On 2014/10/20 0:38, "Aftab Siddiqui" <aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Masato,

Sorry for the delayed response, here is my take:

The purpose of this mailing list is to discuss the proposals and desired outcome from the APNIC community related to the IANA transition from US Government to Global Multi stakeholder community.

I would like to include “the process” as same as original introductory text since somebody may claim IANA accountability is also a part of IANA transition.

So, how about this?

The purpose of this mailing list is to discuss the proposals and desired outcome from the APNIC community related to the IANA transition process from US Government to Global Multi stakeholder community.

Anyone is welcome to join this list and share the information and point of view. Representatives from other regions can also join and participate by sharing their knowledge and understanding.

If I would be skeptical, it sounds we were accepting comments which is not related with APNIC, but related with the IANA transition.

Also, first and second sentence are somehow duplicated, so how about this?

Anyone, including one from other region/community,  is welcome to join this list and share the information and point of view within the purpose of this list.

Representatives from other regions can also join and participate by sharing their knowledge and understanding.

Any positive contribution is welcome from within the APNIC community and outside, while keeping in mind the cultural diversity and respect for the difference of opinion. APNIC mailing list code of conduct will be strictly followed [1].

 

Please note that this mailing list is strictly for IANA transition/transfer discussion, for discussion on any other topic please find appropriate mailing list here [2]

 

[1] https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/join-discussions/code-of-conduct

 

[2] http://www.apnic.net/community/participate/join-discussions

I don’t see any problem for remaining part.

Regards,

Masato

 

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myamanis@japan-telecom.com> wrote:

Aftab,

While I understood your first point, at least I would like to differentiate actual discussion about other communities’ proposal from information sharing

to facilitate more regional discussion and focus on outcomes from APNIC community.

Also, we don’t have any reason to host discussions in other communities and/or global coordination by APNIC.

Regarding your second point, I totally agree with you.

Do you have any idea for revised text for that point?

Regards,

Masato 

On 2014/10/16 22:15, "Aftab Siddiqui" <aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Masato,

My preliminary draft is,

This mailing list is for discussion on the proposals and desired outcomes from the APNIC community of the process to transition IANA away from the US Government in terms of number resources perspective.

It is welcome to share information about discussions in different regions and communities and global coordination, but it is not a place to discuss such topics.

Though I agree with the idea and purpose of this draft but I think we shouldn't limit the discussion on the same topic from other regions, this might help the APNIC Community to understand what is happening else where. Secondly, it should be known that the whole focus of this ML is IANA Transition process and nothing else. Any other discussion should be on apnic-talk.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui