Re: numbers for in-addr

  • To: hhui at arcfour dot com
  • Subject: Re: numbers for in-addr
  • From: bmanning at isi dot edu
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 05:49:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: iepg at iepg dot org
  • In-reply-to: <19971216232419.19704.qmail at obsidian dot stardot dot com> from "Hui-Hui Hu" at Dec 16, 97 04:24:19 pm
  • Posted-date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 05:49:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Sender: owner-apops@apnic.net
    • > 
      > 
      > "other" seems pretty substantial--can you elaborate on some of the errors
      > that might have fit into this category? (does that include unreachable
      > nets?)
      > 
      
      other is pretty large. I expect that many are behind firewalls, some are
      beyond the diameter of the network, or the dynamics of the routing system
      may have some effect.  In general these are systems that generate at least
      one valid response to a query and then go silent.  This effect may also be
      due to poor placment of the servers in the topology. 
      
      -- 
      --bill
      _________________________________________________________________________
      To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apops-request at apnic dot net
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------