Re: BGP question.

  • To: Jumpot Phuritatkul <howdy at nectec dot or dot th>, apops at apnic dot net
  • Subject: Re: BGP question.
  • From: Scott Huddle <huddle at mci dot net>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:53:41 -0400
  • Cc: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene at cisco dot com>
  • In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970618175402.14828C-100000 at nucleus.nectec dot or dot th>
  • Sender:
    • If B localprefs D higher it will prefer that route to C 
      (and yet still have it if D goes down)  B can announce 
      C and D to A and it (A) will select BC over
      BDC by virtue of path length.
      Did I miss something?
      At 06:00 PM 6/18/97 +0700, Jumpot Phuritatkul wrote:
      >	Would someone give me a solution for this problem?
      >				(1)		
      > 	[A] --------[B]----------------[C] 
      >		     |	  (2)		|
      >		     +------[D]---------+
      >	There are 4 networks of A, B, C and D.
      >	A,B,C and D have their own Autonomous System Numbers.
      >A is upstream provider of B. B want to announce B,C and D's networks with 
      >AS origin of B to A . I want A to go to C via path (1) A-B-C , and B to go 
      >to C via path (2) B-D-C . How can I set BGP command at B,C and D?
      >Please help me solve this problem.
      >Jumpot Phuritatkul
      >Network Technology Lab.
      >NECTEC, Thailand .
      >To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apops-request at apnic dot net
      To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apops-request at apnic dot net