>Good point.
> And here is my comment.
>
> 1. Regarding current overlay in page 3, don't we need to mention about ASO
> AC/NRO NC
> Â Âwhich is responsible to global policy for IP/AS as part of ICANN?
> Â Â(Current figure seems ICANN is handling it by themselves directly, but
> it is not true)
>
It seems more doable in the timeframe than the previous option of
> 2. While I prefer last option in page 9, do we need "NEW ENTITY 1"
> responsible for gTLD policy?
> Â ÂI agree that it is ideally better to separate gTLD policy and gTLD
> contracts,
> Â Âbut I don't think it is doable in this timeframe.
>
having the NE1 take on a similar policy role for IP/ASNs and ccTLDs as
well.
Whats your opinion on those two options? ÂWhich would be a better
model if there was sufficient time to implement either?
Regards,
Dean
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk