Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress
> And here is my comment.
>
> 1. Regarding current overlay in page 3, don't we need to mention about ASO
> AC/NRO NC
> which is responsible to global policy for IP/AS as part of ICANN?
> (Current figure seems ICANN is handling it by themselves directly, but
> it is not true)
>
Good point.
> 2. While I prefer last option in page 9, do we need "NEW ENTITY 1"
> responsible for gTLD policy?
> I agree that it is ideally better to separate gTLD policy and gTLD
> contracts,
> but I don't think it is doable in this timeframe.
>
It seems more doable in the timeframe than the previous option of
having the NE1 take on a similar policy role for IP/ASNs and ccTLDs as
well.
Whats your opinion on those two options? Which would be a better
model if there was sufficient time to implement either?
Regards,
Dean