Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress
responding.
>Was there any consultation within APNIC before APNIC's leader's name was
>added to this statement? Could you also point me towards the community
>consultation / mailing list discussions that took place before the
>Montevideo Declaration was signed as something APNIC endorsed?
The Montevideo Statement was developed in a short space of time, as the
agreed outcome of a face-face meeting of technical organisation
representatives. There was not a public consultation process initiated by
APNIC (or the other four RIRs) regarding the statement before it was
released.
The statement was not the end of a process; rather, the Montevideo
Statement was designed to be a trigger to encourage community-wide
involvement on different issues, among them, the globalisation of the IANA
function.
That said, I doubt the statement would come as a complete surprise to
anyone who has been engaged in the APNIC community for any length of time.
The references to "globalisation" of IANA and ICANN, for instance, are
consistent with previous submissions by the NRO (on behalf of the RIRs) to
the US Government on the need to withdraw from its historical oversight
role. Likewise the references to Internet fragmentation, to community
consultation and to IPv6 should also not be unexpected; however that said,
we can certainly provide more information and background if needed.
Also of course, the recent discussion session on Internet Cooperation (and
the previous list of sessions Masato pointed out in his earlier email)
were held to inform and consult with the APNIC community, and the last
session has obviously served well in this regard given the level of
healthy discussion it has generated!
See here for the archive:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf7gW16HOfk&t=2125
>>But for now, we wanted to alert everyone to this news and the fact
>>consultation will begin in our region in Singapore.
>Could you outline the intra-APNIC consultations (i.e., not the ICANN
>consultations about which ICANN's published a document) that will take
>place with regard to this? Which mailing list will these discussions be
>directed towards?
The recent US Government announcement (available here:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition
-key-internet-domain-name-functions) is a very recent development, so the
next steps are still being considered. The USG has asked ICANN to lead the
process and consultations will begin in Singapore.
http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ccwg-ig
The following link gives an overview of the process and timings for the
consultation, however we are expecting more details to emerge from the
Singapore meeting:
https://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/functions-transfer-process-1
4mar14-en.pdf
We'd welcome suggestions on what would be the best ways in which the APNIC
community can engage to provide for inputs into the process - potential
ideas include sessions at APNIC conferences and a mailing list for
submissions and discussion among the community. If you have other ideas to
help facilitate discussions we'd love to hear them - thanks.
Kind regards
Tony
On 15/03/2014 4:01 pm, "Pranesh Prakash" <pranesh at cis-india dot org> wrote:
>Tony Smith [2014-03-14 21:42]:
>> As I'm sure you appreciate, the news from the US has just arrived this
>>morning and a lot of the details are still coming to light. We're
>>planning to prepare something that explains what this development means
>>in more detail when more information is confirmed.
>
>I'm sorry, but I'm new to APNIC's lists.
>
>Was there any consultation within APNIC before APNIC's leader's name was
>added to this statement? Could you also point me towards the community
>consultation / mailing list discussions that took place before the
>Montevideo Declaration was signed as something APNIC endorsed?
>
>> But for now, we wanted to alert everyone to this news and the fact
>>consultation will begin in our region in Singapore.
>
>Could you outline the intra-APNIC consultations (i.e., not the ICANN
>consultations about which ICANN's published a document) that will take
>place with regard to this? Which mailing list will these discussions be
>directed towards?
>
>--
>Pranesh Prakash
>Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
>T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org
>-------------------
>Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School
>M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org
>PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
>