Re: [apnic-talk] apnic-talk Digest, Vol 75, Issue 44 - Reforms
Rajesh,
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Rajesh Chharia wrote:
Overlooking any personal remark, let me respond to Johny’s
explanation on behalf of Paul.
Let me be clear here. My response was not "on behalf of Paul".
Any emails here are me, speaking as me, and on no-one's behalf other
than my own. Please do not suggest otherwise. I merely pointed
towards the clause in the current by-laws which pertains to elections
at member meetings in a polite and non-derogatory manner.
If the APNIC bylaws are insufficient then that is a failing not of the
DG, the EC, or the Secretariat, but a failing of the membership as a
whole.
There are several points which have come out on this list in the past
few months which I in fact have believed in for some time.
Unfortunately the conduct displayed by some parties at APNIC29 and on
this list are leading me towards unsubscribing from apnic-talk and
taking an ambivalent approach to any proposed changes.
How about we work on effecting positive change here and not creating
trouble?
Cheers,
Jonny.