Dear Paul,
Do I assume that Johny Matin's response is your response also ?
Desi has been following up on the same before the weekend as well as
later. However, the issue is not over the delay - Johny's
response/attempt is something which either needs to be clarified or
confirmed by you. It would help me to respond/check such misdirection
going on around Apnic Talk.
Desi had expressed his inability to see the details regarding - "who is
responsible to conduct election - EC, or DG or secretariat ? That's not
mentioned in by-laws." Hope the community will get the response from you
this time.
Regards
Rajesh
On 27-Jul-10, at 10:42 AM, Jonny Martin wrote:
Rajesh,
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Rajesh Chharia wrote:
On your response regarding APNIC Election process bylaws, Desi has asked
for clarification twice "that who is responsible for Election, EC or DG
or Secretariat in the advise link/ bylaws document.
In case there is a miss out or lack of clarity in your suggested
document, I personally feel its better to accept and insert the same then
avoiding the response.
It takes people time to read and respond to emails, particularly when
they are around a weekend. Let's be reasonable here. There is no need
to go suggesting the DG is avoiding response at this point.
The link to the APNIC By-laws provided by Paul does indeed appear to
answer Desi's question. I hope that this was genuinely an oversight on
Desi and your parts, and not a deliberate attempt to cause disharmony on
an already dischordant list...
"Part IV - Members
Chairman of Meetings
13. At any meeting of the Members the Executive Council shall be
responsible for the counting of votes in such manner as it considers
appropriate in the circumstances, and may for this purpose appoint 2 or
more persons to serve as tellers."
Cheers,
Jonny.