Dear David, We don’t wait for an accident to occur
to take an INSUARANCE. J I don’t think there is any challenge over
the need of an electoral college for conducting the elections. Now let me elaborate further on other two areas
of concern: 1. When we have
proportionate voting strengths to the size of our members why can’t we
have proportionate representation? Today
world’s biggest brand is the 5 circles of Olympics. The most respected brand in the world
where just one participant from a country is lead by the mast holder in the
same esteem as the one representing a continent with 1000 members. In Olympics, the size doesn’t
matter and that’s why it is more respectable than the other brands. Never
Mind, If we
can have NRO NC election on single vote per member basis, why can’t we
have the same for the EC election? 1. When there is a fixed
term for the ICANN Director, why can’t we have the fixed term for the EC
in APNIC? The call is ours, should we have the similar brand value of Olympics
or allow the organisations like ITU to puncture us forever because of a few ? Regards and best wishes Naresh Ajwani From: David
Conrad [mailto:drc at virtualized dot org] Naresh, On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:33 PM,
Naresh Ajwani wrote:
I can, of course, counter
with my own cliches: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Since you are proposing
changing the status quo, I suspect the onus is upon you to demonstrate
something is broken and needs fixing. Regards, -drc
|