Re: [apnic-talk] Elections
Okay I understand why you propose the Electoral College,
while I don't have any idea why you dare to do vote counting
instead of proposing it, quite frankly speaking.
I agree the electroral college is valid as a choice, anyways.
Akinori, personnally
In message <014e01cabf99$b499a4b0$1dccee10$@com>
"RE: [apnic-talk] Elections"
""Naresh Ajwani" <ajwaninaresh at gmail dot com>" wrote:
| Dear Maemura San,
|
| So why didn't we leave the "timeline issue for the proxy registeration" also on
| independent friends from other RIR? I propose to elaborate the issue further but
| we can't have norms/conflict of interest at our coneveniences and that's why I
| have proposed the Electoral College as first area of concern. Whats wrong with
| this proposal; The electoral college can have friends from other RIR but they
| shall not be accountable to the ECs.
|
| Other two propsoed areas of discussion have the similar reasoning and origin but
| I am optimist and want to discuss the reforms only.
|
| Regards and best wishes,
|
| Naresh Ajwani
|
|
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
| [mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of MAEMURA Akinori
| Sent: 09 March 2010 20:18
| To: brajesh.jain at spectranet dot in
| Cc: apnic-talk at apnic dot net
| Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Elections
|
| Dear Brajesh C Jain,
|
| In message <95E34AF7583A48F58CC7961BCB083259 at in dot spectranet dot com>
| "RE: [apnic-talk] Elections"
| "Brajesh Jain <brajesh.jain at spectranet dot in>" wrote:
|
| | Dear Maemura San,
| |
| | A senior EC person gave a logic , while you were in the chair, that a
| | person should not be present in counting as ballot identity would be known.
| |
| I've checked the scribe but still have no idea who and what
| part you mentioned. Whom do you mean by "A senior EC person"?
|
|
| | Ballot papers have no name, so how come the identity would be known.
| |
| | Hope you would give your response.
| |
|
| No answer to the question since I clearly had a conflict of
| interest as a candidate on anything regarding the election
| on Friday. It is not the question when the motion was made.
| That why I asked Kuo Wei Wu for being tentative chair since
| he is the only officeholder not expiring the term.
|
| For me personally, I have no idea why we cannot leave the
| vote-counting far independent friends like colleagues from
| other RIRs. Anyway, such a procedure should be reinforced
| not to leave any ambigious interpretation.
|
|
| Cheers,
| Akinori@ rather personally this time
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| apnic-talk mailing list
| apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
| http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
|
|
|
|