Ofcourse, as long as: All one may understand here is that the members of NIXI are ISPs and registrars. Whereas, members for NIR are Corporates, Independent Companies (not necessarily are peering to any ISP that is member of NIXI), Defence establishments, Financial Institutions, IT companies, Manufacturing companies, Educational institutions etc who have nothing to do with NIXI. So, the "need" neither addressed them nor the "cause" explains the same since the only document that is available talks about NIXI / ISPAI / DoT / TRAI.... Also, if NIXI has to form the NIR, I don't see a situation where NIXI will alter its board for the cause of NIR to include other members of NIR! Hence, neutrality cannot be achieved since the dominance is of NIXI members, unless a separate Section 25 is established as "by members", "for member" and "to members". --- You may have read over this ten times... but thats the point! I am sure you know the current composition of members of APNIC from India. Kusumba S kramvir singh wrote: When I referred to 'you' not there, it also meant 'we' are not there. But your neutrality point is well meaning.
|