Every stake holder of Internet eco-system in India has not only
supported NIXI but looking forward to have NIR by March 2010. Thanks
Desi and Harish for your support too.
Cheers.
Naresh
*From:* apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
[mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] *On Behalf Of *Harish Pokharel
*Sent:* 19 November 2009 16:19
*To:* Desi Valli
*Cc:* apnic-talk at apnic dot net; Skeeve Stevens; Sanjaya
*Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] Application for India NIR -
Call for Comments
Hi All,
That's very great.
Harish
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Desi Valli <desi.v at net4 dot in
<mailto:desi.v at net4 dot in>> wrote:
Hi Sanjaya,
One more input. As far as the information that I collected, IAMMI,
CCAOI, ISOC, ISPAI (Different associations) have produced their support
letter. Can you confirm whether these are received at your end or not?
Regards
Desi Valli
-----Original Message-----
From: apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
<mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>
[mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
<mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: 19 November 2009 09:27
To: Sanjaya; apnic-talk at apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] Application for India NIR -
Call for Comments
Thanks for that Sanjaya...
Well, we've seen zero public commentary... especially from this side of
Asia Pac... I don't know if there have been any private/direct submissions.
I guess most of us down here wouldn't have too much insight into how the
internet industry works in India and the stability of the organisations
proposing to manage INNIC.
Is there anyone out there who does have such insight and give us people
who don't know a little rundown of the internet industry/community over
in India - even people from India itself...
I would like to hear that people in the Indian ISP community is happy
with what is being proposed.
A complete lack of response, supporting for or against is a little
concerning.
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego dot net <mailto:skeeve at eintellego dot net> /
www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net>
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve <http://www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve> ;
facebook.com/eintellego <http://facebook.com/eintellego>
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?
-----Original Message-----
From: apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
<mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net> [mailto:apnic-talk-
<mailto:apnic-talk->
bounces at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>] On Behalf Of
Sanjaya
Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 1:23 PM
To: apnic-talk at apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] Application for India NIR -
Call for Comments
Hi Skeeve,
Thanks for your feedback!
The objective of the APNIC EC's Call for Comment is not to begin a
collective financial analysis of the proposal. Rather, the EC wants to
find out whether the APNIC community is comfortable with the formation
of an NIR for India, or whether they are aware of risks or further
considerations the EC should investigate as part of its evaluation
process.
If there are concerns related to the financial impact that such an NIR
may have on the fees of direct APNIC members, these concerns of course
should be noted. Equally, if members think such national entities
should
be recognized where there is clear local community support, this should
also be expressed.
The intent of the Call for Comment was to allow members and
stakeholders
a chance to express their concerns and thoughts on the matter and the
EC
would certainly appreciate any comments you may care to make.
Cheers,
Sanjaya
Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Umm... It's a good thing?
>
> I've not seen any public comments on this... Is there any opinions
out there on whether the NIR for India is a good/bad idea?
>
> Can we have some commentary from APNIC on the impact of this change
will have on revenue (clearly initially none as members would have to
cease being APNIC members and become INNIC members - I assume?).
>
> But if they did all become INNIC members, what would the impact on
APNIC be? Not that this is a reason to put forward a negative
position, but I am just wondering.
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> --
> Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
> eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
> skeeve at eintellego dot net <mailto:skeeve at eintellego dot net> /
www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net>
> Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
> www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve <http://www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve> ;
facebook.com/eintellego <http://facebook.com/eintellego>
> --
> NOC, NOC, who's there?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: apnic-announce-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
<mailto:apnic-announce-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net> [mailto:apnic-announce-
<mailto:apnic-announce->
>> bounces at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:bounces at lists dot apnic dot net>] On Behalf
Of Secretariat
>> Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 1:56 PM
>> To: APNIC Announce
>> Subject: [Apnic-announce] Application for India NIR - Call for
Comments
>>
>>
_______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Application for India NIR - Call for Comments
>>
_______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> The National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) has lodged an
>> application
>> for recognition as a National Internet Registry (NIR). If recognized
as
>> an NIR, NIXI would be able to offer IP (Internet Protocol) address
>> allocation and other APNIC services at a national level in India.
>>
>> In the interests of openness and transparency, the APNIC Executive
>> Council (EC) requests public review of the NIXI application and has
>> issued a Call for Comments to gauge community support.
>>
>> The EC will accept public or confidential comments until Monday, 30
>> November 2009 at 17:30 (UTC+10 - Brisbane time).
>>
>> Confidential comments may be:
>>
>> - Emailed to the Executive Secretary of the EC at exec-
sec at apnic dot net <mailto:sec at apnic dot net>
>> - Submitted using the web form at http://www.apnic.net/NIR_Comments
>>
>> Comments may also be made publicly and discussed on the "apnic-talk"
>> mailing list. More information on the list is available at:
>>
>> http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists
>>
>> The APNIC EC is responsible for evaluating and approving the
>> application, but before the EC can do so, it must be satisfied that
>> NIXI
>> meets the "Criteria for the recognition of NIRs in the APNIC
region",
>> as
>> set out in the policy available at:
>>
>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/nir-criteria
>>
>> These criteria require NIXI to:
>>
>> - Demonstrate formal endorsement at the national level by the
>> appropriate government body
>> - Be an independent legal entity with a non-profit structure
>> - Demonstrate a stable funding model
>> - Demonstrate it holds a neutral position
>> - Have the organizational and technical capacity to implement
>> APNIC address management policies
>>
>> For more information, see:
>>
>> http://www.apnic.net/nir
>>
>>
_______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC
<dg at apnic dot net <mailto:dg at apnic dot net>>
>> http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858
3100/99
>>
_______________________________________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apnic-announce mailing list
>> Apnic-announce at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:Apnic-announce at lists dot apnic dot net>
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce
> _______________________________________________
> apnic-talk mailing list
> apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net>
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
--
_______________________________________________________________________
_
Sanjaya email:
sanjaya at apnic dot net <mailto:sanjaya at apnic dot net>
Services Area Manager, APNIC sip:
sanjaya at voip dot apnic dot net <mailto:sanjaya at voip dot apnic dot net>
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858
3100
_______________________________________________________________________
_
* Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net>
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net>
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
Message sent using India's leading Hosted Microsoft Exchange service.
For details visit http://net4.in/hostedExchange
Please consider the environment before printing.
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net <mailto:apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net>
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk