[apnic-talk]Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
Kosuke Ito wrote:
> Hi, German and all
>
> I do understand that LACNIC community like to have their
> own "bootstrap" condition for deploying IPv6 in LACNIC
> region, but I do NOT like to have it with an open jaw
> condition, anyway.
Our members in the LACNIC area are in full and undivided
support of a global view which is what I have been saying
all along. This seems to be in agreement with your
stated position on such a proposed policy as you
state below.
>
>
> And, I would like to know other RIRs people's view on
> this matter, and how LACNIC consider the possible side
> effect to the global community once the LACNIC special
> condition is implemented.
> I believe that RIRs/NIRs community should have a single
> view (even though each region has a different need) on
> the global coordinated policy like the IPv6 policy which
> was built up on the large amount of efforts balancing many
> factors from the global point of view, since the IP address
> space is a global resourse shared accross the globe.
> And RIRs/NIRs, I personally believe, should set a allowance
> of changing the global policy to accomodate a local need.
> When it needs to change (locally), possible effects after
> the change should be discussed from the global resourse
> management point of view at the same time.
Exactly our members view in so many words as again
I have stated several times now, despite Michael Dillons
improper and inaccurate characterizations to the contrary.
>
>
> I would not like to see avalanche multiplication on relaxing
> the allocation conditions initiating from LACNIC to all other
> regions... This is my worry.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kosuke
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
> > German and all,
> >
> > I wonder when if ever LACNIC will be seeking advisory input from
> > the stakeholders/users in their region? I also wonder if LACNIC
> > does seek such input, that the desires and requirements of those
> > participating stakeholders/users will be adheared to in a responsible
> > and direct way?
> >
> > German Valdez wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Izumi
> >>
> >>sorry for delay
> >>
> >>It is intention of the RIR to work in common policies, like the IPv6
> one,
> >>when this is possible.
> >>
> >>Nevertheless, this IPv6 policy proposal is the result of a regional
> need.
> >>So far has accomplished all the step of our Policy Development Process.
> >>
> >>Even though common policies may work well they are not bindig for the
> RIR.
> >>
> >>We are aware that this proposal is broken a common policy. For this
> reason
> >>we are sharing this criteria with the Global IPv6 community.
> >>
> >>This 45 days period of comment (which ends at january 23rd) is not
> part of
> >>the policy development process, however is a faculty of LACNIC's
> Board to
> >>do this. The reason was to recieve more comments from the global
> community
> >>before the Board made a decision.
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>
> >>German Valdez
> >>Policy Liaison
> >>LACNIC
> >>
> >>At 12:07 AM 1/7/2004, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> >>
> >>>It had been my understanding that IPv6 policy would be co-ordinated
> >>>among the RIRs, but this seems to imply a regional policy like IPv4.
> >>>
> >>>That's also one method of the policy process that's proved to work
> >>>well, but it should at least be a concious decision by the RIRs(or its
> >>>communities).
> >>>
> >>>Could someone from the RIRs share the position about this?
> >>>
> >>>Izumi
> >>>JPNIC
> >>>
> >>>From: German Valdez <german at lacnic dot net>
> >>>Subject: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
> >>>Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:16:29 -0300
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>FYI LACNIC is calling for last comments for new policies to be applied
> >>>
> >>>next
> >>>
> >>>>year. One of this policies is a new criteria for IPv6 Initial
> allocation.
> >>>>
> >>>>This proposal is the result of the analysis of the LACNIC IPv6 WG
> and the
> >>>>discussion held during our Open Policy Forum in The Havana, Cuba
> >>>>
> >>>>You can review this proposal at http://lacnic.net/en/last-call.html
> >>>>
> >>>>On december 9th we started a 45 days period for comments for these
> >>>>policies, including the IPv6 one. Comments will be received
> through our
> >>>>policy public list politicas at lacnic dot net, subscription to this list
> is open
> >>>>at http://lacnic.net/en/lists.html. Any comments are welcomed.
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>German Valdez
> >>>>Policy Liaison
> >>>>LACNIC
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>global-v6 mailing list
> >>>>global-v6 at lists dot apnic dot net
> >>>>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>global-v6 mailing list
> >>>global-v6 at lists dot apnic dot net
> >>>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>global-v6 mailing list
> >>global-v6 at lists dot apnic dot net
> >>http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> > Pierre Abelard
> >
> > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > ===============================================================
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
> > Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > global-v6 mailing list
> > global-v6 at lists dot apnic dot net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> >
>
> --
> **********IPv6 Internet Wonderland!************
> Kosuke Ito, Master Planning and Steering Group
> IPv6 Promotion Council of Japan
> (Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University)
> Tel:+81-3-5209-4588 Fax:+81-3-3255-9955
> Cell:+81-90-4605-4581
> mailto: kosuke at v6pc dot jp http://www.v6pc.jp/
> Lifetime e-mail: kosuke at stanfordalumni dot org
Regards,
p
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801