[apnic-talk][Fwd: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial

To: APNIC Secretariat <secretariat at apnic dot net>
Subject: [apnic-talk][Fwd: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size]
From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:30:50 -0800
Cc: "apnic-talk at apnic dot net" <apnic-talk at apnic dot net>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/apnic-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:apnic-talk-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: General discussions on APNIC <apnic-talk.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk>,<mailto:apnic-talk-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk>,<mailto:apnic-talk-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
Sender: apnic-talk-admin@lists.apnic.net


  Your input is needed...

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801

--- Begin Message ---

To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy at psg dot com>, "'Gert Doering'" <gert at space dot net>

Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size

From: "Hans Petter Holen" <hpholen at tiscali dot no>

Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:56:40 +0100

Cc: <address-policy-wg at ripe dot net>,"'Axel Pawlik'" <axel.pawlik at ripe dot net>

Delivered-to: address-policy-wg at lists dot ripe dot net

In-reply-to: <E1AgnqA-000CzK-D1 at ran dot psg dot com>

List-archive: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/private/address-policy-wg/>

List-help: <mailto:address-policy-wg-request at ripe dot net?subject=help>

List-id: Developing policies relating to the management and registration of Internet addresses and routing identifiers <address-policy-wg.ripe.net>

List-post: <mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe dot net>

List-subscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg>,<mailto:address-policy-wg-request at ripe dot net?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg>,<mailto:address-policy-wg-request at ripe dot net?subject=unsubscribe>

Sender: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe dot net

Thread-index: AcPau0BbSW5WaT8KSeuimahbZZk+fQAA+zFw
Could somebody summarize what the APNIC objections to changed policy are ?

-hph

|> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE 
|> lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's 
|wrong with 
|> assuming consensus, then?
|
|maybe because we have not yet implemented that packets and 
|routing information stay only within the ripe region?  it's 
|the global internet we're affecting.
|
|think locally, act globally  
|   -- motto of the small view polluter
|
|randy
|
--- End Message ---