[apnic-talk] RE: 6:224 AU (AUSTRALIA)...Re: 4:117...142...Re: [SIG
Jim,
I, as I am sure most people on these SIG lists, are NOT
interested in your crap. Why don't you go start your own list about
your fantasy ipv8 and leave us to do our thing. If people are
interested, they will join your list... if they are not... they wont....
Don't give us no choice to hear about your view of how the IP space
should be... but never will be.
...Skeeve
ps... scuse the xpost/cc... but perhaps if enough yell, APNIC or a
moderator will boot Jims posts re ipv8 elsewhere.
_______________________________________________________
Skeeve Stevens, RHCE Email: skeeve at skeeve dot org
Website: www.skeeve.org - Telephone: (0414) 753 383
Address: P.O Box 1035, Epping, NSW, 1710, Australia
eIntellego - skeeve at eintellego dot net - www.eintellego.net
_______________________________________________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sig-ix at apnic dot net [mailto:owner-sig-ix at apnic dot net]
> On Behalf Of Jim Fleming
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:47 PM
> To: apops at lists dot apnic dot net; Gaurab Raj Upadhaya; David Luyer
> Cc: Bruce Young; @quasar Internet Solutions, Inc.;
> andy at ccc dot de; Ben Edelman; DannyYounger at cs dot com; Elisabeth
> Porteneuve; eric at hi-tek dot com; espresso at e-scape dot net;
> hans.klein at pubpolicy dot gatech dot edu; jefsey at jefsey dot com; Joanna
> Lane; Joe Baptista; Joey Borda **star*walker**; Joop
> Teernstra; jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com; k at widgital dot com;
> karl at cavebear dot com; love at cptech dot org; ray at fassett dot org; Richard
> Henderson; Richard J. Sexton; steinle at smartvia dot de;
> yjpark at myepark dot com; apnic-talk at apnic dot net; sig-ix at lists dot apnic dot net
> Subject: 6:224 AU (AUSTRALIA)...Re: 4:117...142...Re:
> [SIG-IX] SANOG I , CfP
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Luyer" <david_luyer at pacific dot net dot au>
> To: "Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@Ameritech.Net>; "Gaurab Raj
> Upadhaya" <gaurab at lahai dot com>; <apops at lists dot apnic dot net>
> Cc: <sig-ix at lists dot apnic dot net>; <apnic-talk at apnic dot net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:38 PM
> Subject: Re: 4:117...142...Re: [SIG-IX] SANOG I , CfP
>
>
> > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > > 4:113 GRAPE
> > > 4:114 TRACTOR
> > > 4:115 CARRIER
> > > 4:116 JP (JAPAN)
> > > 4:117 NP (NEPAL) <<<
> > > 4:118 BUG
> > > 4:119 WARM
> > > 4:120 TAXIS
> > > 4:121 CALIBRATION
> > > ======
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > Does your message have any point? Someone announces a
> conference and
> > you take it as an opportunity to plug your own screwed up
> view of a future
> > IP universe.
> >
> > IPv6 may be coming. IPv8/v16, you're on your own planet on
> that one.
> >
> > David.
> > --
> > David Luyer Phone:
> +61 3 9674 7525
> > Network Development Manager P A C I F I C Fax:
> +61 3 9699 8693
> > Pacific Internet (Australia) I N T E R N E T Mobile:
> +61 4 1111 BYTE
> > http://www.pacific.net.au/ NASDAQ: PCNTF
> >
> >
>
> IN-ADDR.AU does not appear to exist...
> http://www.analogx.com/cgi-bin/cgidig.exe?DNS=205.214.45.10&Qu
ery=in-addr.au&Type=255&submit=Lookup
Can people conclude that .AU does not need the allocation ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
6:224 AU (AUSTRALIA)
Jim Fleming
128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
COM...DE...NET...ORG...INFO...BIZ...US...ONLINE
http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
http://ipv8.dyns.cx
http://ipv8.no-ip.com
http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
http://ipv8.no-ip.info
http://ipv8.myip.us
http://ipv8.dyn.ee
http://ipv8.community.net.au
-
- This list (sig-ix) is handled by majordomo at lists dot apnic dot net
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *