RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

To: Geoff Huston <gih at telstra dot net>
Subject: RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
From: Anne Lord <anne at apnic dot net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:49 +1000 (EST)
Cc: Guy Davies <Guy.Davies at telindus dot co dot uk>, ipv6-wg at ripe dot net, lir-wg at ripe dot net, db-wg at ripe dot net, sig-db at lists dot apnic dot net, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net, apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020612215940.02a0d0f0 at kahuna dot telstra dot net>
Sender: owner-apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net


Hi Geoff,

> For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and
> ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely!
> 
> excellent suggestion Guy!
> 
> Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements
> for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED?
  
The terms in the database in connection with this attribute are 
used to reflect the existing policy environment. If you wish to change 
the terms, then the appropriate place to do that (in the AP region) is 
the Address Policy SIG. You are very welcome to make a proposal there. 

cheers,

Anne
--

*              APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List             *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *