Re: [apnic-talk] a proposal agendum for policy SIG at Korea
Obata-san,
Thank you for your comment.
:| At 08:42 00/02/09 +0900, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
:| >Joe,
:| >
:| > Thank you for your comment.
:| >
:| > Yes, I understand phone number is useful. In your case of
:| >an expert engineer, it may be useful rather than harmful.
:| >
:| >
:| > My Idea is that, phone numbers is optional. You can get it
:| >exhibit or suppressed, and if suppressed, POC by upstream
:| >ISP comes to be mandatory.
:|
:| How do you decide who is the upstream? It is a complicated work to quickly
:| find out the responsible upstream.
It can be self-defined, I mean, the address holder defines
the POC to register it to the whois database. To track the
problem with the site you can look up the whois DB and find
the tPOC, the upstream ISP's POC of the site.
:| What we really need is a way to quickly contact the responsible person. It
:| can be either e-mail, phone, fax or any form, which can be chosen by the
:| network owner concerned. However, there need to be at least one on a 24
:| hours basis. Otherwise, it is hard to get quick support when a network is
:| intentionally, non-intentionally or unknowingly doing harm to other networks.
:|
Yes, I agree. Let me make sure, do you mean there is no
need to exhibit the POC at the DB, Obata-san?
:| Yoshi
:|
--maem
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *