Jay and all, I will again second this query. After checking out this mailing list that was put forth as one place where the discussions on the creation of an ASO is really no such thing at least no now. Yet we are seeing different posts from the IETF that such an ASO exists. Where is a discussion list of such an ASO? Jay Fenello wrote: > This posting is a result of an inquiry made > by Jeff Williams. He wanted to know where he > could find PUBLIC discussions on the formation > of the Address Supporting Organization (ASO)? > > Then . . . > > At 12/23/98, 12:09 AM, susancho wrote: > >The discussion list for the ASO effort is available at aso at listbot dot com. > >You can subscribe by sending a blank email to aso-subscribe at listbot dot com. > > Unfortunately, the list does not appear to be real. > > If you join the list and try and view their list > archives, you get: "Sorry, no messages have been > sent to this list yet." > > So the question remains, "Where are the public > discussions on the formation of the Address > Supporting Organization (ASO)?????" > > Jay. > > >__________________________________________________ > >To receive the digest version instead, send a > >blank email to ifwp-digest at lists dot interactivehq dot org > > > >To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: > >subscribe-IFWP@lists.interactivehq.org > > > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: > >unsubscribe-ifwp at lists dot interactivehq dot org > > > >Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email andy at interactivehq dot org. > >___END____________________________________________ > > >From: "susancho" <susancho at tm dot net dot my> > >To: <list at ifwp dot org> > >Cc: "arin" <anr-talk at anr dot org>, "arin Council" <arin-council at arin dot net>, > > "IFWP Discussion List" <list at ifwp dot org> > >Subject: [anr-talk 455] Re: Re: Is it time for a new ASO and PSO? > >Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 08:47:58 +0800 > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800 > >Sender: owner-anr-talk at anr dot org > >Reply-To: anr-admin at anr dot org > > > >Dear Jeff: > >I found a mailing list aso at listbot dot com for the Address Supporting > >Organization. I believe the owner of the list must be committed. There is > >also a responds, etc from zen at excite dot com, I believe. > >Maybe we should try contacting him. > > > >Susan > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: jeff Williams <jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com> > >To: IFWP Discussion List <list at ifwp dot org> > >Cc: arin <anr-talk at anr dot org>; arin Council <arin-council at arin dot net>; IFWP > >Discussion List <list at ifwp dot org> > >Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 1998 4:10 AM > >Subject: [ifwp] Re: Is it time for a new ASO and PSO? > > > > > >|John and all, > >| > >|John Curran wrote: > >| > >|> Private reply seeking input. > >|> > >|> At 02:19 AM 12/18/1998 +0000, jeff Williams wrote: > >|> > >|> >4.) ASO - Address Supporting Organization. To our knowledge > >|> > there is not public posting or documentation outlining such > >|> > and organization that has been made widely available for others > >|> > to even review, none the less participate in discussions and > >|> > debate on at this time. Should it be reasonable for anyone of > >|> > reasonable faculties to consider that any proposal for such > >|> > an organization be considered legitimate? You be the Judge... > >|> > >|> Jeff, > >|> > >|> I believe that the regional IP registries are currently discussing > >|> ICANN with their membership. I know that this was discussed > >|> at the most recent ARIN members meeting in Seattle with the > >|> result being ARIN is to work with the other registries to come > >|> up with an workable draft ASO proposal. > >| > > >| This may be true, as I said "To my knowledge", no such public > >|discussions > >|are taking place with respect to a PSO or and ASO at this juncture. If > >|they > >|are where might a PUBLIC mailing list be located where these discussions > >|are taking place? Please advise. > >| > >|> > >|> > >|> Aside from the membership mailing lists for ARIN, RIPE, > >|> and APNIC, what other mailing lists do you think should > >|> get notification of a draft document once its ready? > >| > >| There should be a mailing list NOW that allows for PUBLIC input and > >|discussion BEFORE a draft document is ready John, that is the whole > >|point of my previous point. Hence I an cc'ing this response to the > >|Arin-talk and arin-council for their information. Why are these > >|discussions > >|taking place "Behind Closed Doors"? BTW, doing so is in violation of > >|the NTIA's White Paper. > >| > >|> > >|> > >|> /John > >| > >|Regards, > >|-- > >|Jeffrey A. Williams > >|CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. > >|Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. > >|E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com > >|Contact Number: 972-447-1894 > >|Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 > >| > >| > > > > Respectfully, > > Jay Fenello > President, Iperdome, Inc. > 404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com > > __________________________________________________ > To receive the digest version instead, send a > blank email to ifwp-digest at lists dot interactivehq dot org > > To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: > subscribe-IFWP@lists.interactivehq.org > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: > unsubscribe-ifwp at lists dot interactivehq dot org > > Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email andy at interactivehq dot org. > ___END____________________________________________ Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature