RE: [apnic-talk] Re: [JPNIC intl-wg 243] Re: comments on legal documents
On Sunday, May 17, 1998 11:59 PM, David R. Conrad[SMTP:davidc at apnic dot net] wrote:
<snip>
@Perhaps I might suggest that if the membership wishes to radically
@restructure APNIC that the existing structure taken from the APNIC
@Seychelles company is implemented immediately as an interim measure and
@then the Executive Council appoint a committee tasked with making
@recommendations to revise the structure of APNIC?
@
Why not leave APNIC in the Seychelles, start a new "NIC" in Japan
with the existing staff in Tokyo and encourage the people in Australia
to also start a NIC based on the structure they have developed ?
This would result in three NICs. The Seychelles company could
cover the areas that the other two companies feel are out of their
scope. By leaving a company in the Seychelles it might help
that region expand the Internet. Also, by having a NIC in Japan
the northern areas of the Pacific Rim could be better served.
You have plenty of cash in the bank. Three companies could
easily be supported for that large region. Also, it should be
easier to staff the companies if they are operated where they
are incorporated. Why make life so complex ?
-
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM
* APNIC-TALK: General APNIC Discussion List *
* To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net *