Re: APNIC Chair and DG Clarification
Geoff,
Thanks very much for your prompt reply and for taking the time to clarify
matters.
In light of this information, I presume that early next week the new chair
will arrange to put forward proposals to the membership as far as retaining
David in some capacity (assuming of course they the new chair *also* talks
to David ;) ).
I'm sorry to hear that you are not available to continue as the Chair; but
would just like to express my appreciation for the time you have served ...
and continue to serve on the APNIC Exco.
Looking forward to some fruitful discussion on apnic-talk at apnic dot net
Cheers,
p.
[ PS: cc'list pruned ]
At 10:48 PM 3/3/98 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
>Pindar,
>
>Thanks for your note.
>
>Lets get these 2 questions answered here.
>
>1) We are electronically voting on officvers right now. We hope to
>have an announcement of officers by the end of this week. I have indicated
>to the other cxommittee members that I am not available to continuine
>for another term in the capacity as Chair of this committee.
>
>2) David is Acting Director-General at present. We will of course
>be talking with hom over a continuing role in this near future.
>
>I'd be happy to answer any other questions, but perhaps the cc list
>should be trimmed down just a little to the apnic-talk list as I suspect
>we are overstepping the mark of cross posting!
>
>Thanks,
>
> Geoff Huston
> Executive Committee Member
>
>At 06:06 PM 3/2/98 +0000, Pindar Wong wrote:
>>TO: APNIC-Exco Members
>>
>>To follow-up on what on what Daniel and I have mentioned earlier, may I
>>humbly ask for clarification on the following:
>>
>>1) Who is currently the chair of the APNIC-Exco? [ are we to assume that
>>Geoff continues in this capacity ]
>>2) Does David' currently have a formal role within APNIC's existing
>>structure? [e.g. interim DG?]
>>
>>I ask this so that we can more fruitfully direct our discussions.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Pindar
>>
>>At 10:13 AM 3/2/98 +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>[ snip ]
>>
>>>I recommend to the APNIC *membership* to consider the person David
>>>Conrad and what he has achieved on their behalf and offer him an
>>>adaequate position within the APNIC structure. Whether this be one of
>>>paid "technical director" or unpaid "special advisor" or some such I
>>>cannot say. What I can say is that in my opinion you should not loose
>>>David and that in order to keep him your explicit support needs to come
>>>from the membership at large and be voiced clearly and individually.
>>>
>>>
>>>Daniel Karrenberg
>>
>>At 11:09 PM 2/27/98 +0000, I wrote:
>>>The question is, have we really tried to formally retain him in some form?
>>>Retainer basis, month-to-month contract extension etc. etc.
>>>
>>>We could after all, explore what engineering work needs to be done and see
>>>if David is interested as CTO or somesuch. He's should know what the
>>>registry needs... he's done it for years.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
>>+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+