Re: Confederation Fee
At 15:04 98/01/18 +0800, David R. Conrad wrote:
> Arano-san,
>
> >Although it was once decided that confederation fee
> >is based on the number of membership, we found that it
> >is difficult to count membership because some interpretation
> >of "membership" is needed confederation by confederation.
> >It might be much more concrete, much easier,
> >much more fair to count ip addresses than membership.
>
> I agree.
>
> >I understand that it is difficult to turn over the decision once done.
>
> Not particularly difficult -- just need to get the membership to vote for a
> new proposal.
>
> >However, I believe it would be better to re-discuss this issue
> >if some of APNIC folks agree with me.
>
> Would you have a proposal written up? Or would you like to go back to the
> previous per-address proposal?
The previous per-address proposal is just fine.
Regards,
Takashi Arano
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone, Corp
Email: arano at byd.ocn dot ad dot jp, Phone:+81-3-5353-2561
_________________________________________________________________________
| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+