Re: Confederation Fee
Arano-san,
>Although it was once decided that confederation fee
>is based on the number of membership, we found that it
>is difficult to count membership because some interpretation
>of "membership" is needed confederation by confederation.
>It might be much more concrete, much easier,
>much more fair to count ip addresses than membership.
I agree.
>I understand that it is difficult to turn over the decision once done.
Not particularly difficult -- just need to get the membership to vote for a
new proposal.
>However, I believe it would be better to re-discuss this issue
>if some of APNIC folks agree with me.
Would you have a proposal written up? Or would you like to go back to the
previous per-address proposal?
Regards,
-drc
_________________________________________________________________________
| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+