Re: RFC 2050
Hi,
David R Conrad wrote at PAGAN:
> I very much appreciate Justin's efforts. In particular, I think someone
> coming up with a draft document that I can take to the the APNIC membership
> and say "here's some ideas or how to evolve current policies -- what do you
> think?" would be *wonderful*.
Is there any chance that APNIC would follow the RIPE "experiment" in
picking up classic "Class A" space? Our company for example is willing
to take the challenge of a say, /16 out of Class A space, and would
document the sub-allocations properly - meaning, just because we get
something that big, we won't be spoiled.
This way, we avoid address space fragmentation in the form of multiple
announcements, one per /19, in case the APNIC member has more than
8192 addreses.
The only consideration would be that we have to punch a hole in the
NSP filters who "sanitize" routing announcements to prevent prefixes
longer than /8 in class A space.
Cheers,
--
miguel a.l. paraz <map at iphil dot net> +63-2-893-0850
iphil communications, makati city, philippines <http://www.iphil.net>
_________________________________________________________________________
| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+