It did say "immediate future".
I would say that it seems reasonable that if you're claiming that
you're going to multihome in the "immediate future" that you would
know the ASNs with whom you were going to peer.

If it was more of a "Well at some point we might want to multihome",
then you might not know the ASN.  But in those situations RFC1930 says
that you should be using a private AS until such time as you are
closer to peering.

Dean
--
Dean Pemberton

Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
dean@internetnz.net.nz

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui
<aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guangliang,
>
>>
>> The option "b" is acceptable.
>>
>> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in
>>      immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed
>>      at the time of submitting a request
>
>
> But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with whom
> they may or may not multhome in future. right?
>
> Regards,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>

> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy