Philip Smith wrote:
Izumi Okutani said the following on 31/1/08 19:18:
Having said that, I'm pretty open to modifications as long as we don't
end up giving IPv6 allocations to anyone.
How about simply making the IPv6 allocation minimum requirements mirror
those for IPv4? Jordi's and this proposal simply say that "an LIR will
That's exactly our intention actually! :-)
We didn't make the requirement itself to be an equivalent (as the
situations in IPv4 and IPv6 are different), but intended to make the
target to be of an equivalent scale.
izumi