Hi Dean,
Thank you for your comment.
From: Dean Pemberton dean@internetnz.net.nz
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal ] prop-112: On demand expansion of IPv6 address allocation size in legacy IPv6 space [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:54:36 +1300
| There are a number of things that concern me about this proposal.
|
| 1) it doesn't appear to support needs based allocation
I think it will be covered by the fee schedule. And also, the space is
reserved for the organizing, and will be unused in the future.
| 2) it doesn't support allocation on nibble boundaries which operators have
| said repeatedly is a major issue.
Yes, however,
1) Current policy do not care about nibble boundaries when address
holders expand their address space. Non-nibble boundary address
will be allocated in all case of address space expantion.
2) Cannot expand to /28 in legacy space.
And this is not discussion point here, but I think:
3) Technically, nibble boundaries will be reasonable, however, too
much IPv6 address space will be allocated if nibble boundary based
allocation is introduced. (/32 -> /28 -> /24 ...)
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki