I think this is an improvement, but I can support either way.

Owen

On Mar 4, 2015, at 21:54 , Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev@dcs1.biz> wrote:


On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve@v4now.com> wrote:
4. Proposed policy solution
---------------------------

An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:

    - they are currently multi-homed OR

    - you have been previous allocated provider independent address space by APNIC AND

- intend to multi-home in the future

May I suggest a change?


An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if:

    - they are currently multi-homed OR

    - you are currently allocated provider independent address space by APNIC AND intend to multi-home in the future

The first change is to remove those who are moving to NIRs, or other RIRs.  They should apply for resources from their current Registery.

The second change is to clarify that the "AND" in #3 applies to #2, not #1 OR #2.

--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208   http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy